Dust
2025-03-03 dust episode affecting El Paso, TX
Daily PM2.5 peaked at 238.6 µg/m³ near El Paso across 1 covered metro home to 879,392 people. 1 metro placed a top-ten day in their record.
Counting the extra PM2.5 above each metro's typical day, this event handed the average affected resident ≈ 15.7 cigarettes. Across everyone living in the affected metros, that is the collective equivalent of ≈ 14 million cigarettes. An awareness illustration of outdoor exposure at 22 µg/m³ per cigarette (Berkeley Earth), counting only the event's ranked days; not a medical dose.
Episode peak
-- cigarettes
The smoke map's scale, replayed over this event: the surface interpolates between covered metros' daily records, framed to the affected region. Hover for a reading, click a metro to pin it to the card. Days a monitor did not report draw nothing.
What happened, in the record
The supplied retained evidence supports dust for this event; no supplied evidence establishes membership in a broader time-bounded episode.
Affected metros
| Metro | Peak PM2.5 | Cigarettes, whole event | Peak day | All-time standing |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| El Paso, TX | 238.6 µg/m³ | 16.6 | Mar 3, 2025 | #3 of its top days |
"Cigarettes, whole event" totals a metro's ranked event days at 22 µg/m³ per cigarette: what a person outdoors there breathed across the event, as the illustration. "All-time standing" is where this episode's days sit in each metro's ranked record (worst-area measure, since 1999). Full local context is on each metro's Air Records page.
The evidence
Agency and publisher pages 1
- El Paso Hasn’t Seen This Many Dust Storms Since the Dust Bowl The report identifies March 3 as an El Paso dust storm and reports that PM2.5 exceeded 1,000 µg/m³ for two hours at one monitoring station.
Status and provenance
Research preview: this record carries research-only status and its boundaries, cause, and name may change as evidence review completes. Grouping policy common_sense_root_cause_grouping.v2. The cause label reflects the assembled evidence above, not an IAQng detection formula.