← Event catalog

Winter inversion

2002-02-06 winter inversion episode affecting Salt Lake City, UT, Ogden-Clearfield, UT

February 6, 2002 to February 7, 2002

Daily PM2.5 peaked at 100.2 µg/m³ near Ogden across 2 covered metros home to 2.0 million people. 1 metro recorded their worst day on record; 2 placed a top-ten day.

Counting the extra PM2.5 above each metro's typical day, this event handed the average affected resident ≈ 6.2 cigarettes. Across everyone living in the affected metros, that is the collective equivalent of ≈ 12 million cigarettes. An awareness illustration of outdoor exposure at 22 µg/m³ per cigarette (Berkeley Earth), counting only the event's ranked days; not a medical dose.

Measured daily PM2.5 at EPA monitors, as cigarette-equivalents

Episode peak

-- cigarettes

The smoke map's scale, replayed over this event: the surface interpolates between covered metros' daily records, framed to the affected region. Hover for a reading, click a metro to pin it to the card. Days a monitor did not report draw nothing.

What happened, in the record

Qualified frozen evidence supports winter inversion as the broad root cause.

Sequence: Salt Lake City (Feb 6) → Ogden (Feb 7)

Affected metros

MetroPeak PM2.5Cigarettes, whole eventPeak dayAll-time standing
Ogden-Clearfield, UT 100.2 µg/m³ 4.6 Feb 7, 2002 Worst day on record
Salt Lake City, UT 91.6 µg/m³ 8.0 Feb 7, 2002 #2 of its top days

"Cigarettes, whole event" totals a metro's ranked event days at 22 µg/m³ per cigarette: what a person outdoors there breathed across the event, as the illustration. "All-time standing" is where this episode's days sit in each metro's ranked record (worst-area measure, since 1999). Full local context is on each metro's Air Records page.

The evidence

Agency and publisher pages 1

What remains uncertain

Status and provenance

Research preview: this record carries research-only status and its boundaries, cause, and name may change as evidence review completes. Grouping policy common_sense_root_cause_grouping.v2. The cause label reflects the assembled evidence above, not an IAQng detection formula.